lol "Engineering committee", just install an appropriate codec pack and youre good to go. here, been using these since 2006: http://shark007.net/win7codecs.html
The recommended minimum bed for 264 is i3-2000, according to the 264 Engineering committee. I can verify that platform does play all flavors of 264 smoothly under Windows, but so far does not for the 1080p HEVC profiles. It jitters, drops frames, drops subs, drops audio.
And a lot of anime fans have hardware that isn't even up to the higher resolutions and profiles of 264.
Exactly where the minimum watchable hardware specs will fall for HEVC remains to be seen.
Nice to have your assurance that if it works for you, it works for everybody, but clearly that's not the case.
shit my htpc itx has an i5 650 from 2010 and it plays hevc just fine too, these little mongols are just dumb, its fucking wikipedia generation, these little retards cant use a toilet without reading how to do it online every morning because their brains are not capable of accumulating information, much less solving trivial things like playing hevc files lol
If you're worry about hardware performance, don't worry. I played HEVC fine even on Ubuntu 12.04 LTE as Virtualbox guest OS. My PC is a low-middle specs, unbearable for gaming (already 5-6 years ago since I bought this PC) and that guest OS even has lower specs than my host OS (Windows 10).
I observed MPC-HC/BE 64bit has lower CPU usage than their 32bit counterpart, and playing HEVC in 64bit video player is about the same CPU usage playing AVC in 32bit video player.
yeah a big tent, like this "its okay to be dumb" and "its normal to be a retard lol" trend that seems to be going these days? fuckem all for all i care, the average iq is lowering wordwide because of crap like this, people dont have standards anymore, as the overgrowing population wasnt bad enough, ugh.
The oldest maxim in computing is that you can't push the hardware cycle. People are not going to buy new laptops to run HEVC. Instead, make a big tent that includes everyone.
While there is still no obvious adoption about HEVC (especially fansubs), vendors are going to support it due to its efficiency. Intel already supported HEVC 8/10 bit hardware decoding, this, and this.
Personally, I would prefer HEVC because it yield smaller file size with no obvious quality regression.
One interesting comparison would be the picture in x265.com. It's from the same developers that implement H264 with their x264.
Exactly. Fansubs pushed 10bit and lost most of their popular support. Instead, they caused the revival two thankfully dead technologies: mp4 containers and hardsubs.
i never said i was one, and seriously, it was the same shit when 10bit encodes came along, the low average thought it was gonna die lol, now is with hecv, ugh.
"Oh, I'm the idiot, huh? Go back to your tree, chimp!"
That's some pretty bad writing for a genius.
Not knowing the issue is hardware makes you quite the dimwit.
------------------------------- Do you know why people fansub? It's because they have an enthusiasm for anime and want to share. Clearly, you've never been a part of that scene. You're just a self-centered leech who wants what he wants and says fuckem to everyone else. Obviously you can afford to support anime at commercial sites. So get going.
well, you cant level it to the lowest of the gene pool, might as well go back to watching drawings on a cave wall. if theres people dumb enough to not be able to use google and double click on a codec pack, fuckem.
It's too bad for Doki. They used to want to be big and popular, to the point it got them into trouble. And if fansubs have any justification, it is about inclusion. HEVC is counter to either goal.
Soon, pompous asses like you will be all that's left.
Actually, I don't have a laptop that can connect to a tv and even if I did, the tv I have does have the output needed for that connection so I would prefer a non HEVC release where possible.
lol so few meaning YOU, everybody has a pc or notebook (or a dedicated htpc) who can be attached or streamed to our tvs, etc. its your problem if youre dumb or running a single core from 2005 lol
Different file hosts are speedy or convenient or accessible differently for different people/locations. Some file hosts that have been actively requested give me terrible service. Some that work well for me don't work well for others, or aren't even accessible where they live. That's what the multiple file hosts are about.
As for adding to link life: 1. I think the vast majority of AT users tend to update on a weekly/daily/hourly/minute basis. It doesn't surprise me if after an initial surge no one downloads a file for the next 60 days after that (the 1Fichier inactivity limit). 2. I don't think you can build any kind of archive using file hosts, for a lot of reasons: They tend to die; They decide content violates their terms of service and delete, etc.
Probably the best archival-like option, for those interested, is to subscribe to a Usenet service. Links there last for years.
wouldn't be less file hosts be better? I think most files get deleted due to inactivity after a certain time period. If there would be LESS different hoster more people would download from the same host -> more activity -> less deleted files.
02/11/2015 09:20 — Anonymous