Some episodes of the https://animetosho.org/episode/shokuge...a-4.167378 does not belong to the season one but still tagged with anidb episode 167378 for season 1 but they are actually season 2 and 3. What can we do to remove the wrong ones?
Hello, Does anyone have a cleaner version of Girls Band Cry ep14? The one saved from Abema's Shibuya Base stream has burned-in subtitles, huge neon rainbow 144pt font size in typical japanese TV style - obscuring half the screen all times, lest we want to see how Toei actually made this series in Autodesk Maya and 3D Doppel 3.0...
Thnaks for the suggestion, but considering how heinously MTL-based LeMeme "fansubs" of GBC turned out, I'd rather wish people do this... If you stop translating now, it's joever!
> I don't think someone will sub that for you. The chance is really next no to nothing.
GBC was actually fan translated and subbed 1990s style, due to total official unavailability outside of Japan during its spring 2024 airing season. There was even fansubs war fought over how to translate the climax of ep8. Reddit got total crazy about GBC and it remains hugely popular in Asia.
You see this is a mirror site, I don't think someone will sub that for you. The chance is really next no to nothing. Thanks for the upload anyway, I wish you the best of luck.
Comment in Feedback 13/12/2024 18:13 — Anonymous: "Kawaranai Momoko"
Hello, anyone wanting to sub Girls Band Cry special episode "How it's Made" from Abema TV?
not really, subsplease has it own website, if nyaa were somehow taken down (but I'd rather doubt it)banother will just rise. I never rely on one site. I use AT because it's convenient. One stop shop for anime. remember torrenting is just a protocol.
No? the fact I can still torrent from AnimeTosho proves that you don't know what torrenting is actually all about. As I said, sites come and go. But torrents will always be there for you.
That's just wrong! They are making it harder and harder for the whole piracy scene and torrent sites aren't spared either. There are many examples from The Pirate Bay to ExtraTorrent to RARBG to recently TorrentGalaxy.
Aw shucks, thanks! But don't look too closely for there are a bunch of grammatical errors that we're too lazy to fix. Like what are these ";" things doing outside of code?
Absolutely none besides enabling desktop users to be lazy and only preview an image before committing and opening it in a "full-size" tab or window. Stretching the definition of usefulness, perhaps letting users see a preview of an image amongst several when the author does not appropriately label them such as when an author embeds several images without sufficient context to identify each embed. That situation might just be very rare and not worth spending time supporting. We made the suggestion to merely consider all possible avenues; we're not married to it or even the feature itself. In fact, we usually browse on a touchscreen so we wouldn't appreciate it ourselves. In the spirit of exhausting all options before completely dismissing the feature, here are a couple more ideas:
Clicking on the image "icon" (not the link) will expand the image inline with the text. Users can view multiple images at once and are not limited to mouse/stylus users. However, this introduces the potential that the embed ruins the compact reading experience unless the user actively collapses the embeds; Considering this feature is targeted towards the lazy, they are unlikely to do that and we are left with the original concern.
Embedded images are added to a gallery or carousel which can be opened in any number of ways (bottom of post, the embed link itself, dropdown/... menu alongside "Reply", etc.). Again, there is not much benefit to clicking a gallery button versus just clicking "Open in new tab" on every image linked - it's purely for the pursuit of laziness. Admittedly, opening a gallery with just one "tap" on a touchscreen is much faster than long-pressing for each link.
The prospect of adding this feature is niche since a large majority of users will not take advantage of it or simply ignore it. Purists will detest expandable images that break the flow of simple text. The gallery will always be seen as inferior to dedicated services like slow.pics. Seeing a small thumbnail when you really want a full-sized zoomable image would also be lackluster for some users as well.
Perhaps keeping it simple is for the best. UX is no easy feat.
01/01/2025 08:19 — Anonymous