An important moot point against the use of dark mode for better visibility is that the light on dark theme (especially for text) is not necessarily good for everyone. Like I said, when you look at the bright mode, it turns bright. For example entering the multiuporg with bright mode. Such a surprise is not good for the eyes. Especially those who have Astigmatism.
I hope the next season doesn't use a dark theme. Although it saves electricity, it is not good for the eyes because this site contains third parties and these sites use a light theme. Nor is it an article site.
Yeah, this website wasn't designed with mobile in mind. It works, but not great there. I'm not sure what you mean by "breaks the layout". Could you perhaps post a screenshot to clarify?
There's no tool to search through feedback comments unfortunately.
Some pages — the main page, a torrent page — if given small enough horizontal screen space, they are made eligible to be scrolled horizontally by the browser. Doing so breaks the layout. (Firefox 99, Chromium 100) Is there a tool to search through the feedback section?
Wiki is good as a overview/for features and such but when it gets to definitions in such cases it's hardly of use because the wording counts. And I don't want to check x sites to build some common ground for some archive definition. It seems the time on the info button I somehow didn't check to open it with winrar instead. (cause custom win theme and symbols they look similar). So it's just the source code (and winrar claiming as archive). xD Yeah Windows does show simply what's defined in registry (HKCU or HKLM\Software\Classes - sadly rarely still in HKCR).
A tip if you want to know the meaning behind words hunt for specifications/documentations not some random sites. The Info button just opens windows properties box. Now windows can only have one definition active for one 3-character extension. So you get to see that. It doesn't claim that it's an archive because it should do real time scan of file to claim anything. What it is (windows) doing is showing you the one meaning which is active at the time you are looking at it. Glad you were able to better understand the workings. <3
Okay, well I knew the file would be stored 1:1 so that direct play is irrelevant (data could be at the end). I thought the metadata would be stored too. But it rly seems to be dynamically read of the stored data (took a short look at the source - SplitHandler)
Then again you can't use the file as a whole as originally intended (depending on content maybe not at all - videos depend on if the player does allow that). And the question might be if it doesn't match or if the definition is not enough and useage of filesystems and dynamic metadata still should be considered. Since many sites do claim it as archive and 7zip themself - in the Gui (see Info Button) as the source code where the split/merge happens I'll probably stay with that. But I do understand that it's a critical task of definition I wont dare to force in that state.
No they aren't considered archive files. Read the first line under https://peazip.github.io/file-split.ht...er_utility and also the first line of the next paragraph. In peazip's words what you got from here (animetosho) is binary data. In peazip's words merging it will give you larger file. If it were archive then they would have written so.
Now technically open these files from here in hex viewer, what you will find is no metadata which says hello I am an archive. All archive files by standard have to say hello I am an archive in their metadata.
Simple task drop this .001 file in media player. What does it do? It plays it because it's media decoders understand it's a media file not an archive. They don't have support for playing files directly from archives until they were built with that support.
I feel one might not be satisfied with the the prev. answer. So, you may never thought of it as such as it's not for backup-storage purpose or such. And the broad use of the extension with different formats is also confusing. Let me post some links. Read those and the wiki again carefully and I do hope this clears up. https://file.org/extension/001 - https://fileinfo.com/extension/001 - https://www.file-extension.org/extensions/001 - https://documentation.help/WinRAR/HELP...olumes.htm - https://peazip.github.io/file-split.html (The 7zip documentation else seems to lack info on that part, but already explained what the tool does show) (@admin about the aim well sry but you've been the one claiming it's not an archive) How you take it on - mulitvolume/split archives - file spanning does happen in archives - no matter the format are considered archive files.
But indeed it does. This already dates back to the old days of floppys,cds and such. Splitting to parts for storage or in this case transmission is part of that. Don't take Wiki wording for 100% - the compression part is not required to make an archive. But indeed metadata is included (Filename, size, date, .. dunno what else). Lets shortcut. Open/select a 00x file slipt in 7zip (right click, split file). Click Info Button: 001...Archive.
I'm not sure what your aim is with arguing your point, but assuming you're not just trying to nitpick, an archive feature does not make an archive.
In particular, from the first sentence from your link:
In computing, an archive file is a computer file that is composed of one or more files along with metadata.
What I'm trying to say here is that split files generated by AT contain no metadata - they're literally the file broken into pieces with no additional packaging.
However, if considering split files as archives is easier to contemplate, feel free to think of them as such.
??? It's still considered and archive NO MATTER the tool used, file extension, ..... And I should have been clear - I meant AT's splits don't offer these functions. Could you .... just stop.
It actually isn't a split-archive. These end in .mkv.001. There's a separate split file function in 7zip. I didn't know about that since I never used it. If you use GUI then the output filename is like that. The split-archives output as .7z.001. All archive features like compression and hashes are doable in split-archives from my experience.
I know it's a bit ugly, but with different languages and such the best working method I could manage. Also sucks that there is no vale option. (regex (by default/in jd) only can reuse the result of a group (?1) but not pattern)
And that's the point, I'm mixing between hosts and don't want to always rename them. Then again I did take a look into jds packagizer and did manage to create s.t., if one is interested: https://www27.zippyshare.com/v/ZcTWkwHr/file.html (cleartext file, can be viewed in advance with npp and json viewer plugin f.e., import in packagizer settings)
RAR, specifically, is problematic due to its proprietary nature. We've done 7z instead, but it uses the same .001, .002 etc splitting scheme.
.001 style splitting is just a plain split, without any archive. Which means that built-in tools in the OS can handle them, so almost certainly will never go obsolete. (copy /b under Windows, and cat commands under Linux).
The split parts aren't archives, though they may appear like one if it's managed an archive application. AT generally tries to preserve the given name as much as possible, but cannot change the behaviour of some hosts to do their own renaming.
Ah, the names are different between hosts, but consistent on the same host. This applies regardless of whether the file is split or not.
Unfortunately MultiUp renames files sent to it - we send the same name (unless a particular host has issues with some names), but the host sometimes does their own renaming, which we have no control over.
Realistically, if the rename doesn't bother you, it's not a problem unless you're mixing parts between hosts. If you are, you just need to rename the parts so that they're consistent.
Nyaa deletions lagged a bit, so we often did manual deletions for it, and TT and anidex. admin added new rules to catch more bogus/malicious stuff as situations evolved. The peak was probably during Horriblesubs days, either because they were a big target or hated. Lots of deleted rar over the years, (I'd say hundreds) if that's the question.
On nyaa they typically get deleted (though some made it, guess oldest on https://animetosho.org/view/n464669 ). It's mostly TT stuff like seems last: https://animetosho.org/view/1621100, generally few files a year. If those are worth any (low) risk but potential "where are the previews" posts?
Dunno why, just read that it's done. May for ddl-reupload. May archiving (though no compression or hash). I did stop questioning such things. There are even ppl here with with win xp so ... whatever. I know it can be renamed, but depends on how the split is set up, the whole of the question.
Why would anyone keep split-archives. It's not like you can use these for torrenting. Split-archive can be renamed, depends on admin ofc. The content filenames isn't altered when making 7z split-archive normally.
Well people sometimes archive stuff before making torrent, noobs / weird reasons. Excluding those torrents whose contents are rar'd would make little sense given the objective of AT.
Did AT rly download rars? In any way this would be question oft the torrent lister. It also has nothing to do with reputation, just broader use. But I don't understand why there is a discussion in the first place. For subs 7z and xy are being used, else split archives (001..). AT recommends software in the faq and I doubt there would be change as open source is preferred. Regardless any current archiving tool should handle these fine.
That I don't prefer - if you do multiple files this soon gets confusing. Also there might be guys out there keeping the archive files. The original filename should stay (as close as possible) but without chars that produce different results (again archives only).
It's like using a split/join app, can't it be changed to part.rar? I think apps like this are obsolete. It would be better to use part.rar like a winrar app. part1.rar, part2.rar etc.
And the question is do you split them before uploading? If so, could you automatically exclude, rename, ... special chars - for files 500MB+ so all have the same name? Renaming should not matter for archives, right?
On that example above, dunno how you do see same name? I don't mean extracted but dl if that's what you wonder. Multiupload: ..... You_re A Genius_ ..... Zippyshare: ..... You're A Genius! .....
Sorry, I'm still totally lost on what you're trying to say. For the example you gave, the filename is the same with both parts, except the .001 and .002 extensions.
Are you getting chopped off names or something? Please give precise details.
That is clear to me! It's about that till recently all hosts that do split had the same filename. It might be even a bit longer ago. But it seems to be with names including special chars I happend to dl recently. Like f.e. https://animetosho.org/view/n1519687 - here it's the "!".
I'm not sure what your question is exactly. If my guess is correct, some hosts, like Zippyshare, only support files up to 500MB in size, so files exceeding that limit need to be split into parts. You'll need to download all parts and combine them to get the original file back. See "How do I join multi-part (.001, .002 etc) files?" under FAQs.
Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately the system wasn't designed with that in mind (it works using a series of filters, of which you could have multiple, including multiple names), but I'll try to see if I can accommodate that.
Since yesterday I started taking note of files that have a bigger size than 500mb to have another with zippyshare than with MultiUp-hosts. Do you know the reason, can this be fixed on your side? Thanks - in advance and general.
Thank you for your service. Can you have the title tag in shows' RSS feeds to contain the names of respective shows instead of "Anime Tosho"? Just so I don't have to rename them in qBittorrent.
Comment in Feedback 20/04/2022 17:51 * — Anonymous: "Steve Angeli"
Thanks. Looks like that one took around 10 minutes to show up after it was posted, which is a little unusual. Not sure why exactly - maybe Nyaa happened to serve a cached feed, or the user just happened to hide it when the scrape initially occurred.
@admin just been around the time of this post and the only one thats not been on the startpage (meaning also not yet fetched or dl) was https://animetosho.org/view/n1516032
27/04/2022 18:29 — Anonymous