Oh, thanks. I thought the main cause for removal was copyright infringement and so on. Isn't there a reliable hoster that only deletes a file if it is not accessed after a set interval (even if it was uploaded by an unregistered user)? Out of curiosity though, isn't it possible to make the hoster believe that a given file is accessed before each time that interval expires?
My second suggestion only makes sense for links which remain active for a good while. I am not sure about AT's system but such link checking, as I once tried, is quite easily doable and pretty correct. Something along the line searching for a text saying "404" or "not found". Then again I don't know how AT tried.
1. AT works by using free commercial file hosts, like 1Fichier, Sendspace and Solidfiles. Most/almost all file deletions are due to host preset time limits or time/inactivity limits. For example 1Fichier files are deleted after 60 days of inactivity, regardless of their file names.
2. AT says they've tried expired-link detection/marking and it proved unreliable. Time again is the most reliable indicator of file life. Under 60 days, probably fine. Over 60, maybe. Way over 60, unlikely.
It would be nice if: - The file in question is archived and the archive is given a random name. The links would last longer. Even better, place them behind a shortener. - There is a function for expired link detection and marking. That way we would know what to expect. Thanks for reading :)
Probably ddos. I believe there was a similar attack at the same time last year. Nyaa page access is on and off, torrent traffic doesn't seem to be affected. Pretty much handled, I would say.
Yeah, I hope they aren't dropping SF. It's my favourite host from the available ones, but the last few days it seems they haven't been uploading stuff there.
When I see someone saying kids are good... I'm just reminded how hard ppl fail at educating them... One could say that's the way ungrateful leechers are born. Marrying isn't all that good/happy. Anyway if Tibbs is away because he's busy being happy, whatever his happiness may be, I'm happy for him too.
Fuck, man...now I can't get me more a slave that rather spent their time harvesting some files to upload somewhere else out there on any other site for a, two or four or more complete strangers, without any needs for a favor in return whatsoever. Truly, he is such a goddess for this community. Aiiii, captain Tibb! Long live your magnanimous life over that side of reality! Please don't come back too if you read this, because getting married or having kids is much more better in every sort of way!
AT's goals and structure are about the broad distribution of new releases, not the servicing of archival requests. Lots of stuff isn't here and will never be. Things that are here are only available for a short time. AT is a portal, not an archive.
I have a feeling these sites don't put much effort into ensuring consistent statements, so what exactly is true, nobody knows... (perhaps except that it'll likely die if it's too good to be true)
I use jdownloader 2. Just copy the url of the anime and jdownloader fetches all hosters and checks if they are online. It than downloads the files from your prefered hoster.
Currently there's a back-up of 20 shows waiting for re-tries at Solidfiles. It's not uncommon for sf to be unresponsive to new upload requests now and then, for unspecified reasons. It usually clears in a few hours.
It's interesting to contemplate: At the end of 90 days your daily upload traffic would double, then go up to 8X current level after one year, and to 16X after two years, to maybe 1.2TB upload processing per day at the current rate of 75GB/day? And continue increasing forever.
24/12/2015 21:28 — Anonymous