Thing is, I doubt it automates very well, and I doubt it'll be any better than what others do. I'm not particularly a fan of re-implementing that's already been done. Thanks for your perspective nevertheless.
As for RSS feeds, there actually is a hidden/unofficial feature for that. You can append a 'aids=' parameter onto the RSS URL with a comma separated list of show IDs. For example, to show Haikyuu and Sword Art Online II, you could use https://animetosho.org/feed/rss2?aids=10145,10376 You can get the ID from the series URL by taking the number after the dot, eg https ://animetosho.org/series/haikyuu.10145
As mentioned above, it's not resource loading time, it's rendering time for me. Disabling Javascript makes the page load a fair bit faster, so it's likely a slow script trying to handle a lot of files. This is on the main folder. Sub-folders load much faster as they have fewer files.
You may wish to consider disabling thumbnail support. It doesn't really seem to work, but the script will still send off hundreds of requests to try fetching them.
Advantage? Well, it's always nice to have everything in one place :) And what do you think about custom RSS feeds, where you "subscribe" to the shows you're watching?
I'm not complaining, but if it is helpful: With Firefox, a page reload of AT creates a one second 65% cpu usage spike; A page reload of yuki creates a 10 second 100% cpu spike on my older laptop. The new scan code boxes are probably a part of that load, and not a feature that I would guess most people have a use for.
What part? The old theme I had took a while to send the request and display the contents, whereas this one loads the page and will display the contents dynamically once ready. I do notice however that it takes awhile to load an subdir (unless a separate request), but it has an advantage - it will allow seamless interaction going back and forth between dirs once the data has been read (as long as you don't refresh). These index pages weren't really meant to house a large sum of files.
I loaded the page on both Chrome and FireFox but I didn't see any noticeable difference. Is there an issue with browser compatibility? The integrated search feature will probably be removed since it's slow. Although some may find it handy. Hmmm.... What a dilemma.
There shouldn't be any difference in transmission of data unless at the time there was a drastic increase in traffic. I should look into using CloudFare's CDN at some point though.
I think I was working on stuff when you posted your comment, so it could have been the misfortune of that.
Let me know if you still have problems! (I did notice that FireFox will still play files instead of download (unlike Chrome) even though I changed my conf file to avoid that - I guess more work needs to be done!)
I'd like to point out that the FAQ says "However if there's something you want, you can elect to post a comment in the skipped torrent to see if anyone is willing to help." I'm sure you checked the link and the FAQ before answering right? Now, while I didn't post in the skipped torrent it's not the first time someone asks for some skipped torrent here and admin pushes it up, I think I did it so in the past too.
Are you a lonely ad man? need someone to talk to? here at babes4ulonelyadpeoples we cater to your needs! Only 9.99 per minute! Call now and you will also receive this complimentary boot up your ass absolutely free! Our man has trained long and hard to really get his boot up there far! you will not be disappointed!
Just listen to the statements of our happy customers "yeah i twas lonely ad man, i call to make friend and get free boot in ass, was very good"
So don't hesitate call us on now 911 and ask for Mr piggy, he'll hook you right up!
I think the favicon looks so ugly I can't have this website in my bookmarks bar. Please do something with it like a small letter combo in red/white instead of @
What search term are you looking up? A fair number of common terms don't generate enough results to exceed what's displayed, and for those that do, often the links are dead.
You can also try using Google with "site:animetosho.org".
Like admin said, the ISP knows exactly what you are doing, including if you're running a vpn --if they want to examine your traffic. But I also agree with admin that ISPs probably doesn't care what you're doing, unless your traffic load exceeds their business model. However, I would note two possible exceptions: Institutional ISPs like universities which often block torrent traffic and do other stuff on policy; Or if your ISP is a media group like Comcast, which is possibly unknown territory.
In practical terms, I would say the ISPs probably don't care what you're doing, but encryption is free and easy so why not encrypt your traffic whenever possible, and that is as far as I would go for precautions. And use proxies if/when you are blocked from sites.
1. You can hide your web destinations from your ISP with a proxy service. There are free and pay versions of this kind of service. One free one I use occasionally is: https://simple-proxy.com/
But I've only used it to browse sites FireFox won't go to for some reason, not to dl or torrent. There may be dl or torrent restrictions for free services. Your ISP will know you went to a proxy service website, but not what happens after that.
2. Another thing you can do for both torrents and dl services is use encryption (https for dl, accept encrypted peers only for torrents). Then the ISP can't just read your traffic packets. They would still know your destinations though, if all you did was encrypt. For example, with dl services here AnonFiles is a https site, DevHost and Tibb is not.
Last note: 1. DL sites may keep records of who uses them. We hope they don't anymore, and it's not much in their interest to keep such records especially after what happened with MU, Hotfiles, and Fileserve a few years back.
Technically they can track any internet activity they want - after all, you're they serve you all your internet. So really, it depends on whether your ISP cares enough.
Most ISPs don't 'track' torrents as there's often little reason for them to do so. Some may have legal requirements to do so, some may throttle torrent traffic for various reasons (which isn't exactly 'tracking'). Other organisations may observe trackers and forward complaints to your ISP, but if this is your case, then the ISP isn't doing any tracking.
10/08/2014 12:42 — admin