Comment in Feedback 27/05/2025 20:25 — Anonymous: "Not_A_Random_Username"
Fair enough. Thanks for taking the time to reply!
Every service is going to have features individual users don't like, or is going to lack one or more features individual users want, and as users we simply need to find the service that meets our needs and preferences in a way we prefer. That in mind, AnimeTosho is the best site I've found and I truly appreciate all the time and effort that goes into maintaining it.
Thanks again, and best wishes.
Comment in Feedback 25/05/2025 14:22 — Anonymous: "Anonymou"
Is there any chance that such a feature (filter to only multi-file torrents) might be added in the future?
Batch detection can be a little icky, e.g. a movie could come with some auxiliary files, yet wouldn't be a "batch". There is some detection for this (used to determine whether to display links on the listing page), though I'm not sure of the accuracy.
Building efficient indexes for search filtering can get a bit involved, and there's always another filter that could be added, so I've decided to keep the search function simple. This site also isn't naturally geared towards dealing with batches, so I'm less inclined to go there.
Hopefully the workarounds do a good enough job.
Comment in Feedback 25/05/2025 04:23 — Anonymous: "Not_A_Random_Username"
Thank you for the response.
Many of my searches have come up empty because of the use (or non-use) of the term "batch" in the title, so that method is quite unreliable in my experience. - Sorting by size, on it's own, has proved a tad annoying due to the presence of the BDRemux torrents which are absolutely massive in filesize with little to no difference in quality from the HEVC that I prefer, and often have too few seeds to make up for the difference, but combined with "[anime name] -BDRemux -remux" this is much more feasible. A good piece of advice for others if they haven't already gotten into the habit of using the exclusion terms in their searches. - I had not considered using the browser Find function for this. Thank you for the tip, this will absolutely save a bit of time in some fringe cases. (Assuming I remember to use it) - After using this service in the way that I do for so long my eyes scan the right side for the folder icon, then jump to the left to find the team name, so I've already got a nice habit making use of the folder icon.
Is there any chance that such a feature (filter to only multi-file torrents) might be added in the future? If so, please provide the opposite as well, as I'm sure there is a niche for it. (And if one of them is added, the other should require close-to-zero effort)
Thanks for the comment. Unfortunately there's no explicit way to filter for batches. Some submitters will use the term 'batch' in the title, which you can include in the search. Otherwise options that may work for you: - sort the search results by size, descending, as batches will generally be larger - use your browser's search (Ctrl+F) to find "files)" on the search results page, which will highlight entries with more than one file - to the left of the size, a folder icon is used to indicate torrents containing more than one file - you can use that to quickly scan for entries with more than one file
Comment in Feedback 24/05/2025 00:17 — Anonymous: "Not_A_Random_Username"
I've been using and loving this service for a while now, but I'm curious if there's a way to refine search results based on whether it's an individual file or a batch download? If I missed something, please let me know. If it's currently not possible... might I suggest such a feature being added in the future?
More often than not, I prefer the batch download as it's easier to seed, and much more organized. (Not to mention you get the same quality of subtitles across every episode)
Sorry about that. I've been restructuring the database a bit, and had to pause updates temporarily. For Mediainfo, I've made a new endpoint (show=file instead of show=torrent - example) as I'm a bit concerned the torrent endpoint response might get a little large.
I have noticed that you have recently removed the Mediainfo from the torrent response in the json endpoint, is there a new way of fetching the mediainfo from the api now?
The one making such comments is a troll. His methods are troll, like making grade-school level insults trying to get a rise out of admin. Trolls make a game out of trying to get others to waste their time.
It only got a single premiere in Hollywood. It's not actually available outside of Japanese theaters. No WEB or Blu-ray release yet. You'll have to wait for that. Also, AnimeTosho doesn't do releases either so you'd be better off asking actual fansub groups and such when that happens.
Changes on the streaming service's backend that broke their bot in some ways, seems fixed? Other groups didn't seem to be as affected, so for the day they had trouble you could have gotten some other group's releases, there's like 3 or 4 bots ripping CR on nyaa.
Download all the parts to the same location. I don't grab part 1 from GoFile because most of the time it is misnamed. I use BuzzHeavier for part 1 if not all parts. Double click on part 1 and if you have WinRAR or 7zip it will give you instructions on where to place the merged file etc.
Admin, please delete all contents from animotvslash. They do not intend to share content to torrents, but seek traffix containing g*mbling ad* and malwar* from popup adz. and block keywords "Animotvslash" to prevent them from being available to animetosho. https://animetosho.org/search?q=Animotvslash
I have no idea if this is just my browser (Opera), although it's never happened before this week: right now if I click to display the full set of preview images, open any of the images, and hit the back button to return to the episode page, I see only the two base images, without the extras OR the option to unhide them. The only way to get the three additional images back is to refresh the page and hit the unhide link again. (If I open one of the two base images without expanding the set first, the unhide link will still be there when I hit the back button.)
Has anything changed in the coding that might cause this?
27/05/2025 20:25 — Anonymous: "Not_A_Random_Username"